Impressions - "Noone killed Jessica"

In a shocking turn of events, record-keepers re-opened their history books, tore the existing pages, and attached a couple of new ones. After watching Raj Kumar Gupta’s, No one killed Jessica, Supreme Court is reconsidering its decision of life imprisonment for Manu Sharma. The justice in-charge accepted that the movie has tarnished his image of Jessica. His sympathy has subsidized to considerable levels after watching the ill-treatment against Manu Sharma in the bar as shown in the movie.

“The guy was literally pleading for some more Alcohol. It was illegal on Jessica’s behalf to serve drinks to her friends and deny everyone else under the roof of law (read BAR CLOSED). If the bar is closed then it must for everyone without any special favors. I agree Manu was misbehaving but the discrimination against him fueled his rage and not anything else. On one hand you flood Margaritas, whiskies, etc to your confidants and on the other, you deny a shot to a civilian. That’s a crime by itself and contempt of court who made such laws,” said Mr. Jethmalani after coming out from the first day last show. He is also planning to sue the pathetic actor for such a poor and pathetic impersonation of the legendary liar oops lawyer.

“It is all Gandhiji’s fault,” Ramalingam, a movie watcher, told us after we asked him so who killed Jessica?

“What?” Yes, we had the same reaction.

“Gandhiji’s theories have always led to disastrous results. First, Pakistan, then Congress, and now Jessica’s murder,’ replied Ramalingam. On asking how so, he refused to explain and hinted that a common-man needs no explanation of a simple logic. Our camera captured a “Godse” tattoo on his back as he left.

“I didn’t know he was innocent. I mean the chap only meant to scare her. Her constant rebuttal instigated him at the first place. According to the movie, Manu wanted to shoot in air. That was a big shocker to me. It all now looks like an accident to me. Poor children,” said Mrs. D’souza who feels confused about the whole incident after watching the movie.

“It was black (Manu) and white (Jessica) for me, but now it is all grey. Portrayal of Jessica’s character is slightly shady. I wonder if it was meant for the masala in the movie or if it was for real,” said Lavyna, a Delhi University college student, after watching the movie. She has been suffering a mental breakdown since she saw the movie. The villain and hero in her canvas seem to exchange places. Should we call it the power of cinema or the greed of corporate world to reap benefits from anything and everything?

I expected the movie to be a real revelation of the chain of events or to be a message for the viewers to understand the importance of life. However, this piece of c***ma delivers conflicting, twisting, and depressing messages. Undoubtedly, the movie raises questions on Jessica’s image and challenges the detestation against Manu, which is mind boggling (in a bad sense) for me. I feel cheated but I fail to decide by whom? What was the purpose of the movie? Tell me, what shall I assume?

Latest News: WWF has decided to launch a campaign against the film and its crew, some Rani M in particular, for repeatedly using a species' identity and thier name for derogatory purposes. The bitches felt offended after it.

Pamela Patwardhan
Correspondent
Fake News